PIC1867j11引脚被提示弃用怎么回事？

只看该作者 · 2019-4-26 09:13

【】查阅资料PIC的PORT引脚是可用的，为什么还出现这么多提示？
../I2C.c:39: warning: (1385) variable "_RC3" is deprecated (declared at D:\MPLABX\xc8\v1.41\include\pic18f67j11.h:14866)
../I2C.c:41: warning: (1385) variable "_RC4" is deprecated (declared at D:\MPLABX\xc8\v1.41\include\pic18f67j11.h:14868)
../I2C.c:56: warning: (1385) variable "_RC4" is deprecated (declared at D:\MPLABX\xc8\v1.41\include\pic18f67j11.h:14868)
../handing.c:30: warning: (1385) variable "_RD6" is deprecated (declared at D:\MPLABX\xc8\v1.41\include\pic18f67j11.h:14918)
../handing.c:36: warning: (1385) variable "_RD7" is deprecated (declared at D:\MPLABX\xc8\v1.41\include\pic18f67j11.h:14920)
../handing.c:57: warning: (1385) variable "_RD5" is deprecated (declared at D:\MPLABX\xc8\v1.41\include\pic18f67j11.h:14916)
【】翻了下头文件，PORT引脚都被_DEPRECATED了，如下（我用的MPLAB X IDE V5.15，XC V1.41），什么原因呀？
extern volatile __bit _DEPRECATED    RA0                @ (((unsigned) &PORTA)*8) + 0;
#define                               RA0_bit          BANKMASK(PORTA), 0
extern volatile __bit _DEPRECATED    RA1                @ (((unsigned) &PORTA)*8) + 1;
#define                               RA1_bit          BANKMASK(PORTA), 1
extern volatile __bit _DEPRECATED    RA2                @ (((unsigned) &PORTA)*8) + 2;
#define                               RA2_bit          BANKMASK(PORTA), 2
extern volatile __bit _DEPRECATED    RA3                @ (((unsigned) &PORTA)*8) + 3;
#define                               RA3_bit          BANKMASK(PORTA), 3
extern volatile __bit _DEPRECATED    RA4                @ (((unsigned) &PORTA)*8) + 4;
#define                               RA4_bit          BANKMASK(PORTA), 4
extern volatile __bit _DEPRECATED    RA5                @ (((unsigned) &PORTA)*8) + 5;
#define                               RA5_bit          BANKMASK(PORTA), 5
extern volatile __bit _DEPRECATED    RA6                @ (((unsigned) &PORTA)*8) + 6;
#define                               RA6_bit          BANKMASK(PORTA), 6
extern volatile __bit _DEPRECATED    RA7                @ (((unsigned) &PORTA)*8) + 7;
#define                               RA7_bit          BANKMASK(PORTA), 7
extern volatile __bit _DEPRECATED    RB0                @ (((unsigned) &PORTB)*8) + 0;
#define                               RB0_bit          BANKMASK(PORTB), 0
extern volatile __bit _DEPRECATED    RB1                @ (((unsigned) &PORTB)*8) + 1;
#define                               RB1_bit          BANKMASK(PORTB), 1
extern volatile __bit _DEPRECATED    RB2                @ (((unsigned) &PORTB)*8) + 2;
#define                               RB2_bit          BANKMASK(PORTB), 2
extern volatile __bit _DEPRECATED    RB3                @ (((unsigned) &PORTB)*8) + 3;
#define                               RB3_bit          BANKMASK(PORTB), 3
extern volatile __bit _DEPRECATED    RB4                @ (((unsigned) &PORTB)*8) + 4;
#define                               RB4_bit          BANKMASK(PORTB), 4
extern volatile __bit _DEPRECATED    RB5                @ (((unsigned) &PORTB)*8) + 5;
#define                               RB5_bit          BANKMASK(PORTB), 5
extern volatile __bit _DEPRECATED    RB6                @ (((unsigned) &PORTB)*8) + 6;
#define                               RB6_bit          BANKMASK(PORTB), 6
extern volatile __bit _DEPRECATED    RB7                @ (((unsigned) &PORTB)*8) + 7;

只看该作者 · 2019-4-26 09:14

PIC18F67J11

只看该作者 · 2019-4-26 13:41

bellstudio 发表于 2019-4-26 11:34
是这种写法过时了，早就在用PORTCbits.RC3 这种结构体的写法了

编译器瞬间洁净了好多

只看该作者 · 2019-4-26 17:21

这是旧的风格,看了你这个帖子,我就发了一个AVR PIC IO口风格对比的帖子

只看该作者 · 2019-4-28 16:16

代码风格更新换代了

只看该作者 · 2019-4-28 16:25

要跟谁潮流的步伐哦..